Will Google Photos Upload Mpg Videos

TL;DR

Yous can store unlimited video files in a compressed format for free using Google Photos.
However, certain video file formats will now count towards your Google Drive quota, rather than be free and unlimited.
The change in policy could be in response to people bending the rules to get costless storage of non-video or not-photo files.

Recently, Google updated a support folio related to the unlimited gratuitous storage characteristic within Google Photos. Now, information technology appears there'south a new limitation to the unlimited storage of video files, via Android Police.

Previously, whatsoever video files you uploaded to Google Photos from your smartphone would be compressed past Google and not count towards your storage quota within Google Drive. Notwithstanding, at present information technology appears Google is clarifying which video file formats are supported with this feature, which ways some file formats volition now take away from your Bulldoze storage.

The new policy took effect on December half-dozen, 2018.

The supported video file formats are: .mpg, .mod, .mmv, .tod, .wmv, .asf, .avi, .divx, .mov, .m4v, .3gp, .3g2, .mp4, .m2t, .m2ts, .mts, and .mkv.

Users report Google testing manual bokeh effect in Google Photos

News

That list encompasses pretty much every mutual video file format, simply in that location are are some notable exceptions. RAW, for example, is non on the list. While very few people are uploading RAW video files from their phones correct now, future smartphones might make RAW video formats more than commonplace, and then the lack of support for this format could be upsetting down the route.

It's possible Google made this change as a response to people gaming the unlimited storage system. For example, less-scrupulous users could disguise a DVD rip as an uncommon video file format, and then upload information technology from their telephone to Google Photos. Since this potentially-huge file doesn't count against their Drive quota, the user can store the file in the cloud for costless when otherwise they'd have to pay for it.

That's merely a theory, of course, but it could exist at least part of the reason for this update.